Fair TradingINTERNET RELAY FLORISTS REVIEW - BACK TO REVIEW
READY FLOWERS COURT REPORTS
AMENDED
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
TO BE PUBLISHED
SHORTLY
COURT REPORT #1 Federal Magistrates Court Brisbane - published 01 May 2009
At the Directions Hearing on 30 April 2009, Mr. Harvey Rough who claims to have a law degree (but apparently is not a lawyer) turned up from Perth WA as an employee of Ready Flowers Pty Ltd under the impression that he could represent Ready Flowers when MIDDLETONS LAWYERS are on the Court Record. The Federal Magistrate informed Mr. Rough that either he or MIDDLETONS should have been well aware that, the Court Rules require Ready Flowers to have a lawyer to represent it and only a practicing lawyer who is registered in the Court to practice can represent the first respondent. The Federal Magistrate inquired as to where the MIDDLETONS lawyer was, and Mr Rough stated that as of 2 days ago MIDDLETONS does not represent his employer any more in this proceedings and it later came to light that Ready Flowers cannot afford a lawyer when Mr. Rough stated so. Despite this debacle, the Federal Magistrate granted leave for Mr. Rough to appear for Ready Flowers on the day notifying Mr. Rough that the leave is a once only concession and will not be repeated in the future.
The Federal Magistrate inquired as to when Ready Flowers was to file a defence and Mr. Rough stated that a defence would be filed when the applicant had finalised amendments to the statement of claim. Despite Ready Flowers being in default of filing its response and defence, because the applicant had filed minor amendments during the default time the Federal Magistrate appeared to conclude that the failure of Ready Flowers to file a response and defence was somehow the applicant's fault.
It will be interesting to see how Ready Flowers is going to eventually produce a defence document, if it cannot afford a lawyer.
Mr. Rough complained bitterly to the Federal Magistrate that the applicant's website (this website) was causing Ready Flowers considerable lost revenue which was in the region of a 50% drop in market share from something marginally over 10% to something marginally over 5% and Mr. Rough sought legal advice from the Federal Magistrate as to if anything could be done. Despite the matter being irrelevant to the proceedings, the Federal Magistrate gave advice which essentially said that if Ready Flowers has a genuine claim it should sue the applicant.
The hearing of the applicants interlocutory application for substituted service on the second respondent (Mr. Owen) did not proceed due to the Federal Magistrate pointing out to the applicant that despite MIDDLETONS letter of withdrawal to the Registry, because MIDDLETONS had not removed itself from the Court Record according to the Rules of the Court, that MIDDLETONS still represented the second respondent and that the applicant should serve the Originating Process on MIDDLETONS for the second respondent. That service has now been made on MIDDLETONS.
The applicant notified the Court that due to the recent information that Ready Flowers Limited (registered Hong Kong) has been trading via its website ReadyFlowers.com.au in Australia at the first respondents place of business in TECHNOLOGY PARK at BENTLEY WA (albeit without an ABN number or a Foreign Company Representative registered with ASIC as required by Corporations law or paying GST), the applicant wished to join Ready Flowers Limited and its directors who are Peter Ross Hegarty and Thomas Ross Hegarty otherwise any orders that may be made against the first respondent Ready Flowers Pty Ltd would likely be useless. The applicant has until 14 May to file his interlocutory application for leave to join other parties and file an amended statement of claim to suit. That application is to be heard on 29 May 2009. The applicant is yet to decide if Deborah Hegarty director of the first respondent should also be joined.
COURT REPORT #2 Federal Magistrates Court, Brisbane - published 20 August 2009
At the hearing of the application by the respondents to strike out the applicant's Statement of Claim on 23 July 2009, Federal Magistrate Jarrett reserved his decision and the matter was adjourned.
The decision will be published when available.
And this has all resulted from the publisher seeking that the Ready Flowers website declares commissions and devaluations
.... a ten minute job.
The images below outline what the publisher believes, consumers (and florists) should be made aware of.
FROM READY FLOWERS REVIEW
READY FLOWERS

FROM ZOOM BLOOMS REVIEW
Fair TradingHOME


















CATCH WORDS / PHRASES / LINKS FOR ONLINE FLORISTS REVIEW :
• Flowers Australia
• Florist Australia
• Corporate Flowers
• Send Flowers
• Baby Gifts
• Valentines Day Flowers
• Funeral Flowers
• Mothers Day Flowers
• Mothers Day Gifts
• Flower Shop
• Christmas Hampers
• Christmas Flowers
• Florists
• Buy Flowers
• Order Flowers
• Flowers Delivered
• Same Day Flowers
• Flowers Online
• Flower Delivery
• Gift Hampers
• Brisbane Florist
• Melbourne Florist
• Flowers Brisbane
• Flowers Canberra
• Flowers Hobart
• Hobart Florists
• Newcastle Florist
• Adelaide Florist
• Darwin Florist
• Flowers Darwin
• Sydney Florist
• Flowers Melbourne
• Canberra Florists
• Flowers Launceston
• Launceston Florist
• Flowers Sydney
• Flowers Newcastle
• Flowers Adelaide
• Perth Florist
• Flowers to New Zealand
• Flowers Canberra
• Flowers Sydney
• Flowers Darwin
• Flowers Brisbane
• Flowers Adelaide
• Flowers Hobart
• Flowers Melbourne
• Flowers Perth
• Florist Adelaide
• Florist Brisbane
• Florist Canberra
• Florist Darwin
• Florist Hobart
• Florist Melbourne
• Florist Perth
• Florist Sydney
• New Baby
• Get Well
• Love and Romance
• Just Because
• For Her
• For Him
• Congratulations
• Thank You
• Anniversary
• I'm Sorry
• Sympathy and Funerals
Ready Flowers
Teleflora
Fast Flowers
Easy Flowers
Online Flowers
Petals
1300 Flowers
Roses Only
Flowers.com.au
Florist.com.au